SentinelEU AI Act
EU AI Act — Enforcement: 2 August 2026

Prepare your AI system for compliance with confidence.

Evidence you can defend. Compliance you can explain.

Sentinel analyzes AI repositories and generates structured technical evidence that supports EU AI Act assessments.

Built for AI providers. Trusted by auditors. Grounded in technical evidence.

app.gettingsentinel.com/audits/AUD-2026-04721
GAPAUD-2026-04721

TalentScreen Pro v3.1

HIGH_RISK · Annex III §4 · HR/Employment

72/100

Article Coverage

Art. 9
84%
Art. 14
31%
Art. 10
89%
Art. 20
96%
Art. 15
58%

Top Findings

CriticalArt. 14No human override mechanism detected
HighArt. 10Data governance documentation incomplete
MediumArt. 15Adversarial robustness tests absent
audit.jsonSARIF v2.1Annex IVSBOMRSA-PSS
Evidence-based
Deterministic
Explainable
Integrity-verified
Built for human review

The problem

The gap in your evidence is the gap a regulator finds first.

Auditors are expected to evaluate increasingly complex AI systems while working with incomplete documentation, evolving regulations, and repositories that often contain thousands of files.

Finding evidence is no longer the hardest part. Proving that the evidence supports a compliance conclusion is — and with enforcement already underway, that proof can't wait.

€30M or 6%

of global annual turnover — the maximum fine for non-compliance with EU AI Act obligations.

Sentinel was built to reduce that burden.

If a regulator asks tomorrow, you should already have the answer today.

AI systems evolve continuously. Documentation becomes outdated. Repositories change every day. Sentinel exists to give providers and auditors a reproducible technical baseline — an evidence preparation platform, not a legal decision engine.

What Sentinel does

Turns your repository into audit-ready evidence.

Every repository is analyzed to identify relevant technical signals, organized into structured findings, and mapped to applicable regulatory requirements — resulting in a transparent audit dossier that can be reviewed, challenged, and improved by humans.

What it prepares

The technical evidence auditors need.

What it isn't

Not a certification of AI systems.

What it doesn't replace

Legal interpretation and judgement.

How it works

Repository in. Structured evidence out.

Connect a repository

GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, or any URL.

Static evidence scan

Code is read, never executed.

Signed audit dossier

Findings mapped to EU AI Act articles.

See how it works

Why professionals trust Sentinel

Built on evidence, not opinion.

Static analysis only

Your repository is never executed — read-only, zero side effects.

Cryptographic integrity

Every audit is signed and independently verifiable.

Deterministic results

The same repository always produces the same findings.

Human review preserved

Sentinel prepares evidence — professionals decide.

Fully traceable

Every finding maps back to the exact source evidence.

Transparent methodology

Every score is reviewable, nothing is a black box.

Explore the full methodology

See a real audit

Not a mockup. A real repository, really audited.

app.gettingsentinel.com/audits/AUD-2026-00026

A high-risk AI recruitment tool, audited exactly like your repository would be — no special treatment, no cherry-picked result. Provider name withheld for this public sample.

NON-COMPLIANT

AUD-2026-00026

TalentMatch AI

HR / recruitment · high-risk (Annex III §4)

20/100
316 signals detected24 files scanned22 articles scoredRSA-PSS-SHA256 signed

Independently verifiable: the signature above was checked against the published Sentinel public key and confirmed valid.

View the complete audit

What gets assessed

Every compliance conclusion starts with evidence.

Sentinel maps technical findings across 22 EU AI Act articles and 33+ technical patterns, producing traceable evidence for every assessment — each finding references the exact file, function, and line.

Art. 9Risk Management
84%11pt
Art. 14Human Oversight
47%11pt
Art. 10Data Governance
89%8pt
Art. 20Logging & Traceability
96%8pt
Art. 5Prohibited Practices
100%7pt
Art. 15Robustness & Security
58%5pt

22 articles scored · ARTICLE_WEIGHTED_V3

Risk categories

PROHIBITEDArt. 5

Hard FAIL — any prohibited practice overrides all other scores regardless of result.

HIGH RISKAnnex III

Full 22-article assessment. All Annex IV documents required. Sector multipliers applied.

LIMITED RISKArt. 50

AI output transparency obligations. Disclosure patterns verified in user-facing code.

MINIMAL RISKUniversal

Universally applicable articles only. Lighter assessment scope.

GPAIArt. 53

General-purpose AI obligations. Separate scoring track for model providers.

Scoring model

Four verdicts. Four tracks.

A numeric score alone doesn't determine compliance. Four independent evaluation tracks run in parallel — any can override the final verdict.

Verdict thresholds

≥ 85

Statically Aligned

All static signals satisfy requirements

≥ 65

Aligned

Material compliance achieved, minor gaps

≥ 40

Gap

Material gaps — remediation plan generated

< 40

Fail

Hard violations — fundamental remediation required

Override tracks

A

Governance Track

Required documents must exist and exceed quality threshold. Missing Annex IV overrides the score.

B

Technical Track

Code-level signals for critical articles verified independently. A failing article can't hide in an aggregate.

C

Score Gate

Hard floor per article — no single article may fall below its minimum regardless of others.

D

SIG Integrity

Comments stripped before verification. Compliance written only in comments is detected and rejected.

What you receive

An audit-ready evidence package.

Evidence Package

Evidence RegistrySoftware Bill of MaterialsDependency InventoryRepository Metadata

Compliance Analysis

Article MappingGap AnalysisExplainability ReportEvidence Confidence

Documentation

Annex IV DraftRisk DocumentationCompliance Summary

Integrity

Digital SignatureIntegrity ManifestEvidence IndexExport Bundle

Every audit is cryptographically signed and can be independently verified.

View a sample dossier

Who uses Sentinel

AI Providers

Prepare evidence and documentation before market placement.

Auditors & Legal

Review structured, traceable evidence — not raw code.

Compliance Teams

Catch regressions on every release, before they reach a regulator.

Principles

Everything Sentinel produces follows the same rules.

Evidence before conclusions.

No compliance statement should exist without supporting evidence.

Deterministic by design.

The same repository should produce the same findings under the same evaluation rules.

Cryptographic integrity.

Every audit is signed and independently verifiable.

Human oversight, always.

Final compliance decisions belong to qualified professionals.

Explainable findings.

Every finding traces back to the exact evidence that produced it.

Transparent methodology.

Every score should be traceable. Every conclusion should be reviewable.

FAQ

Common questions

Better evidence leads to better compliance decisions.

Sentinel helps AI providers prepare audit-ready technical evidence and helps auditors review it with confidence. Start your first repository audit.

22 articles assessedAnnex IV generatedRSA-PSS signedSARIF outputRe-audit delta